12-10-2006, 05:05 PM
|
#1
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rockvale,TN
Posts: 860
Year: 1995
Trans: C4
|
|
my single port Flow #s
well i never did post the Flow #s from my weak single ports. soo here is da #s.
Intake-1.84 intake valve
.050-49.7
.100-85.7
.150-138.9
.200-168.5
.250-199.2
.300-216.4
.350-236.8
.400-251.0
.450-268.3
.500-278.7
.550-287.4
.600-294.0
.650-304.6
.700-312.1
exhaust-1.575
.050-34.2
.100-48.1
.150-71.0
.200-99.2
.250-124.1
.300-151.4
.350-178.9
.400-204.7
.450-222.1
.500-234.8
.550-248.0
.600-259.7
.650-264.1
.700-266.7
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!!
First to make 500rwhp
first and only over 600rwhp.
667rwhp on 30psi and race gas.
9.73@138.65mph 1/4mile
6.23@113mph 1/8th
1.44 60ft
550rwhp and 503rwtq(24psi new set-up 93 octane)
sponsor: www.delkperformance.com
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2006, 05:14 PM
|
#2
|
|
Another Statistic
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 6,283
Year: 2000
Trans: 4R70W
Timeslip: 14.1
|
Weak is right, don't those out flow any split port heads out there?
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2006, 05:24 PM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rockvale,TN
Posts: 860
Year: 1995
Trans: C4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slvr2000stang
Weak is right, don't those out flow any split port heads out there? 
|
lmao they sure do.
but thats only untill we put the big valves in your heads.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!!
First to make 500rwhp
first and only over 600rwhp.
667rwhp on 30psi and race gas.
9.73@138.65mph 1/4mile
6.23@113mph 1/8th
1.44 60ft
550rwhp and 503rwtq(24psi new set-up 93 octane)
sponsor: www.delkperformance.com
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2006, 05:35 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Charleroi Pa
Posts: 6,040
Year: 1998
Trans: 4R70W
|
|
holy ****
__________________
98 3.8
mods
currently:
11 psi Procharger 2 core kit
3.73's with Detroit truetrac and TA Perf girdle on the 7.5 rear, stock injectors, FMU, 4R70W with B&M shift kit and 2500 stall. junkyard 97 motor . 310LPH ford pump running 9psi max now
mods to complete:
Comp custom grind from Delk ( ordered) home ported heads,Rhodes variable dur roller lifters, .030" ross 8.5:1 slugs, Eagle H-beam 351W rods, Pro-m Univer cal for 42's, ford 42lb squirters,SCT Xcal,Supercoupe lower with 4.6 Elbow and TB, Delk main stud and girdle D1, for about 18-20psi
|
|
|
|
|
12-11-2006, 04:25 PM
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 53,255
|
yeahhhhhhhh. Dem boys flow just fine.
__________________
-Nathan
Mysteed Performance
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TBR
You're posting on a message board because you want to deliver input, and you'd obviously like your input to be valid. If this wasn't the case, you either wouldn't post, or you'd just smash keys with your computer turned off. Now, that being said, your opinion isn't based off who you are, it's how valuable your input is to the community and this is where grammar comes into play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-12-2006, 01:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
'00 232
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madison, Al
Posts: 1,226
Year: 2000
Trans: T5
|
gha. insane numbers.....
heres RPM's comparison...
single port:
210cfm @ .550" lift intake
157cfm @ .550" lift exhaust
split port:
258cfm @ .550" lift intake
153cfm @ .550" lift exhaust
thats amazing..... no wonder you push so much to the ground  can delk do that for every customer?
__________________
Mods: FRPP Aluminum driveshaft, Pro 5.0 shifter, SCT XCal II, K&N intake filter
32.5 MPG HWY
|
|
|
|
|
12-12-2006, 08:02 PM
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rockvale,TN
Posts: 860
Year: 1995
Trans: C4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by supramkivtt2jz
thats amazing..... no wonder you push so much to the ground  can delk do that for every customer?
|
yes we will try. i hope to get these heads out on the market soon.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!!
First to make 500rwhp
first and only over 600rwhp.
667rwhp on 30psi and race gas.
9.73@138.65mph 1/4mile
6.23@113mph 1/8th
1.44 60ft
550rwhp and 503rwtq(24psi new set-up 93 octane)
sponsor: www.delkperformance.com
|
|
|
|
|
12-12-2006, 10:22 PM
|
#8
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 53,255
|
Matt, how much can you port and polish a set of splitport heads and about what would it cost?
__________________
-Nathan
Mysteed Performance
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TBR
You're posting on a message board because you want to deliver input, and you'd obviously like your input to be valid. If this wasn't the case, you either wouldn't post, or you'd just smash keys with your computer turned off. Now, that being said, your opinion isn't based off who you are, it's how valuable your input is to the community and this is where grammar comes into play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2006, 06:04 AM
|
#9
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rockvale,TN
Posts: 860
Year: 1995
Trans: C4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysteed
Matt, how much can you port and polish a set of splitport heads and about what would it cost? 
|
we are working out a price. soo i will have to get back to you about that.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!!
First to make 500rwhp
first and only over 600rwhp.
667rwhp on 30psi and race gas.
9.73@138.65mph 1/4mile
6.23@113mph 1/8th
1.44 60ft
550rwhp and 503rwtq(24psi new set-up 93 octane)
sponsor: www.delkperformance.com
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2006, 06:05 AM
|
#10
|
|
Cammed Fury
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Livermore,CA
Posts: 7,964
Year: 00
Trans: 5-speed
|
Cool I may have to contact you this summer.  Excellent numbers.
__________________
11 psi procharger, RPM 201 cam, QA-1 K-member, 3" Univer maf, Steeda springs, M&M caster camber plates, Steeda Tri-ax, X-cal 2, LC1 wideband, 42 lb injectors, 300 lph fuel pump, BBK 65mm tb, Ta Performance 7.5 girdle cover, and assorted apperance iteams. 326hp 311tq
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2006, 07:11 AM
|
#11
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 53,255
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 700hpv6
we are working out a price. soo i will have to get back to you about that.
|
That's cool. I just have the feeling that I might need some better flowing heads by summer.
__________________
-Nathan
Mysteed Performance
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TBR
You're posting on a message board because you want to deliver input, and you'd obviously like your input to be valid. If this wasn't the case, you either wouldn't post, or you'd just smash keys with your computer turned off. Now, that being said, your opinion isn't based off who you are, it's how valuable your input is to the community and this is where grammar comes into play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2006, 07:46 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 1,128
Year: 2000
Trans: manual
|
|
very nice Matt.
very few people make me jelous but you do it quite often.
|
|
|
|
|
12-13-2006, 08:19 PM
|
#13
|
|
Need Money ASAP
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South Korea.
Posts: 2,821
Year: 1997
Trans: auto
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysteed
That's cool. I just have the feeling that I might need some better flowing heads by summer. 
|
Hold on to your heads. I'm going to send one of mine up to see what it flows on that bench. That way we can compare my current numbers to those.
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2006, 05:14 AM
|
#14
|
|
'00 232
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madison, Al
Posts: 1,226
Year: 2000
Trans: T5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dapack69
Hold on to your heads. I'm going to send one of mine up to see what it flows on that bench. That way we can compare my current numbers to those.
|
his flow numbers are basically saying you can stick your head in each port
__________________
Mods: FRPP Aluminum driveshaft, Pro 5.0 shifter, SCT XCal II, K&N intake filter
32.5 MPG HWY
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2006, 08:38 AM
|
#15
|
|
232 or 330
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,712
Year: 2002
Trans: gears, always
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by supramkivtt2jz
heres RPM's comparison...
single port:
210cfm @ .550" lift intake
157cfm @ .550" lift exhaust
split port:
258cfm @ .550" lift intake
153cfm @ .550" lift exhaust
|
Are these the best numbers for the splitport?
__________________

332/365@10.2psi
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2006, 11:15 AM
|
#16
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 53,255
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dapack69
Hold on to your heads. I'm going to send one of mine up to see what it flows on that bench. That way we can compare my current numbers to those.
|
Yeah, but I'm running a splitport setup now Keith.
__________________
-Nathan
Mysteed Performance
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TBR
You're posting on a message board because you want to deliver input, and you'd obviously like your input to be valid. If this wasn't the case, you either wouldn't post, or you'd just smash keys with your computer turned off. Now, that being said, your opinion isn't based off who you are, it's how valuable your input is to the community and this is where grammar comes into play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2006, 01:50 PM
|
#17
|
|
'00 232
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Madison, Al
Posts: 1,226
Year: 2000
Trans: T5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomzac
Are these the best numbers for the splitport?
|
its what rpm advertises. id advertise my best if i were trying to sell something...
__________________
Mods: FRPP Aluminum driveshaft, Pro 5.0 shifter, SCT XCal II, K&N intake filter
32.5 MPG HWY
|
|
|
|
|
02-24-2009, 02:13 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14
|
|
going to bump this one up, I'm interested in how you got that high of a number with the limited CSA and floor radius through the factory short turn.
What bore size did you flow these on? What was the runner volume after the port work? Did you flow the port with no valve to see how efficient the design of the port by itself is?
The reason I am interested, is that the short turn in the factory castings is not very good (very small radius) and the bowls are very deep.. and for even the most efficient short turn (Pro-stock head, ~115 cfm/in^2) there would need to be 2.71in^2 of CSA across the short turn to get your numbers. Did you raise the roof to get that CSA? I've been widening the walls at the short turn to try and get more CSA, but I'm ~.030" from breaking through on both sides and it's nowhere near 2.7 in^2.
Also, the best of the best cfm/in^2 of valve area that the best head porters are getting with aftermarket head castings of the 13-15 degree type (similar angles to 3.8) is roughly 100-105cfm/in^2 at a lift/diameter ratio of .3. Your numbers work out to be 108 cfm/in^2 at .3 lift/diameter, so I'm wondering how you reconstructed the intake ports (especially the bad port) to get that efficient of a port. Numbers like these are unheard of with any type of factory casting.
Last edited by defrag010; 02-24-2009 at 02:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 09:21 AM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
|
|
Last edited by norstang; 02-25-2009 at 09:38 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 11:13 AM
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14
|
|
I read both of those, but didn't see anything about the authenticity of the head flow other than a few people making some wise cracks about 300cfm..
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 01:43 PM
|
#21
|
|
Speed Racer Mod. Suck It!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,247
Year: 2002
Trans: 5 speed
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by norstang
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by defrag010
I read both of those, but didn't see anything about the authenticity of the head flow other than a few people making some wise cracks about 300cfm..
|
I understand the spreading of how Delk sucks and what not but IIRC Matt did his own work on those heads and motor. I wouldn't dismiss them as a "Delkism" yet.
P.S Please keep this on topic and not spin it into an "I hate Delk" thread. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 02:47 PM
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14
|
|
Basically, what I'm getting at is that there is not enough cross section in the factory intake ports to support that CFM with that size valve on single port heads. That's on the good port too, the bad (middle) port is alot worse. Basically, to get those numbers with that valve size someone had to have ground out the whole factory port in the head and somehow created a smaller SB2 or pro stock intake port inside the factory casting. The stock ports are not efficient nor large enough to support that much flow.
The flow numbers listed on these single port heads are about 108 cfm per square inch at a .3 lift/diameter ratio with a 1.84" valve.. to put it into perspective, a heavily ported Brodix 265cc 18 degree chevy head only flows 102 cfm per square inch at .3 lift/diameter..... and there is no way a stock ported 3.8 intake port is more efficient than a Huge ported brodix intake port.
Last edited by defrag010; 02-25-2009 at 02:57 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 03:44 PM
|
#23
|
|
Another Statistic
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 6,283
Year: 2000
Trans: 4R70W
Timeslip: 14.1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by greensteeda
I but IIRC Matt did his own work on those heads and motor. I wouldn't dismiss them as a "Delkism" yet.
P.S Please keep this on topic and not spin it into an "I hate Delk" thread. Thanks 
|
Matt had those heads ported by the same guy that did mine. I know I sent the heads to the guy for Matt.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 03:47 PM
|
#24
|
|
Speed Racer Mod. Suck It!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,247
Year: 2002
Trans: 5 speed
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slvr2000stang
Matt had those heads ported by the same guy that did mine. I know I sent the heads to the guy for Matt.
|
I see. I guess I misread where he said he built the motor. Nothing was said about him doing the port work. Thanks for the correction
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 06:24 PM
|
#25
|
|
Another Statistic
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago 'Burbs
Posts: 6,283
Year: 2000
Trans: 4R70W
Timeslip: 14.1
|
|
No problem. I hope everyone contributes to the head flow off.
|
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 07:35 PM
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 14
|
|
I have access to a flow bench right now every day until the end of June, if people would cover shipping I wouldn't mind doing a head flow-off. Bench is a superflow 600
|
|
|
|
|
01-17-2010, 08:36 PM
|
#27
|
|
Kicker of Arrogant Asses
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Just south of the North Pole
Posts: 3,139
Year: 1994
Trans: AOD
|
|
Out of curiosity, were there ever any pictures or flow bench numbers posted for these heads?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-19-2010, 06:13 AM
|
#28
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rockvale,TN
Posts: 860
Year: 1995
Trans: C4
|
|
i know there is some pics around v6p and i also posted the flow numbers i got from the heads at a local shop. just search v6 for Matthewneuharth.
also i did the port work on my first set of heads with the stock ford valves. i went 9s on those. i didn't do the port work on these heads.
i did build me engine.
__________________
The First and Only 9sec production based V6 Stang!!
First to make 500rwhp
first and only over 600rwhp.
667rwhp on 30psi and race gas.
9.73@138.65mph 1/4mile
6.23@113mph 1/8th
1.44 60ft
550rwhp and 503rwtq(24psi new set-up 93 octane)
sponsor: www.delkperformance.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:23 PM.
|